Biden has the authority to help demilitarize police but isn't using it
Speaking Security Newsletter | Advisory Note for Activists and Candidates, n°154 | 20 April 2022
If you find these notes useful, you can support this newsletter and SPRI, here. Sharing these newsletters also helps. Thank you!
**Many thanks to Tori B. for becoming SPRI’s latest supporter on Patreon. Please consider joining Tori and other inspirational people here to help keep this newsletter going.**
A condensed summary of where we’re at with police reform
The Democrats’ big police reform bill, the Justice in Policing Act (JPA), passed the House last March and then languished in the Senate before negotiations over the legislation totally collapsed in September. Congress’ failure to pass the bill doesn’t totally excuse the near total lack of progress on police reform, however. Biden can enact many JPA provisions himself. A leaked draft of an executive order from December showed that Biden was at least strongly considering it, but he never issued the thing. In short, nothing has fundamentally changed.
Police (de)militarization
The JPA is feeble, insipid, and generally misses the mark, but the bill has some material in it that could make for some useful executive orders if adopted/amended in the right way. One of which pertains to police militarization; specifically, the ‘1033 program’—a War on Drugs legacy authority that permits the Pentagon to send surplus military gear to state and local police. Law enforcement agencies tend to be more violent when they participate in the program than when they don’t. One study found a dose-response relationship between 1033 program acquisitions and police violence: The more military gear police receive, the more likely they are to kill people (and people’s pet dogs).
The 1033 program (10 U.S. Code § 2576a) was formally established by the 1997 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which then-Senator Joe Biden voted for. It was a pilot program before that: The 1033 program’s predecessor was enacted via Section 1208 of the 1990/1991 NDAA (Public Law 101-189). Joe Biden voted for this bill, too. And when the 1033 program was expanded through the 2016 NDAA, Biden was vice president.
Biden’s latitude on police militarization
Even if Biden’s record wasn’t what it was, he’d still be responsible for the more than $1.72 billion in combat gear that’s gone out through the 1033 program since its inception. This is because as president, Biden could easily recall all this military equipment by issuing an executive order. The 1033 program isn’t a sales program—it only authorizes the Pentagon to loan military gear to police. The militarized equipment transferred through 1033 remains Pentagon property regardless of how long the matériel has been in police custody. Put simply, Biden is free to order the Pentagon to take all its stuff back.
That’s why the values in the chart below are cumulative. That Biden isn’t using his presidential authority to revoke the combat gear on loan to police through the Pentagon’s 1033 program makes him responsible for all of it—not just the military gear that has been loaned out since he’s been in office (>$106 million). The dataset is from this month’s quarterly disclosure by the Department of Defense.
-Stephen (@stephensemler; stephen@securityreform.org)
Find this note useful? Please consider becoming a supporter of SPRI. Unlike establishment think tanks, we rely exclusively on small donations.