Military industry-backed lawmakers more likely to support police militarization program
Speaking Security Newsletter | Advisory Note for Organizers and Candidates, n°76 | 8 April 2021
You can support this newsletter here and SPRI, here.
Context
Rep. Johnson and 28 other House members asked Biden to issue an executive order that prohibits military gear from being transferred to police through the Pentagon’s 1033 program. A solid write-up on this week’s action, here:


Why I did this study
The 1033 program inflates both police and Pentagon spending. Although the military equipment is ostensibly free, police still have to ask state/local government to cover the costs related to shipping, mandatory training, operation and maintenance, and, eventually, the additional wrongful death lawsuits that come about because having/using combat gear makes police more violent.
It inflates Pentagon budgets too because the more stuff DOD can purge from its existing stocks, the more it can say it needs (in its budget requests to Congress). By extension, military contractors also have a parochial interest in maintaining/expanding the 1033 program because shrinking Pentagon budgets affect the war industry’s bottom line.
Marianne Williamson captures that dynamic here in a RT of my article in Jacobin. Her analysis helps explain why over a third of the military gear police receive through the 1033 program is brand new:


Political donations from military contractors and support for progressive action on police militarization, a comparison
Even if you control for Republican shitheadedness (none signed on to Johnson’s letter), the correlation’s still there when looking only at Democrats, too:
Thanks for your time,
Stephen (@stephensemler; stephen@securityreform.org)
Find this note useful? Please consider becoming a supporter of SPRI. Unlike establishment think tanks, we rely exclusively on small donations.